38  I  SEED WORLD EUROPE  I  SEEDWORLD.COM/EUROPE | MAY 2026
DISEASE RESISTANCE: FROM 
HELPFUL TO ESSENTIAL
If climate is one pressure, disease is another 
and the two are linked. Changing climates 
alter pest dynamics, and restrictions on 
crop protection narrow the tools available. 
In that environment, resistance breeding 
becomes central.
Patel lists key viral targets such as 
tobamoviruses, potyviruses and tospovi­
ruses, alongside the need to keep up 
with new races of global pathogens such 
as Fusarium, anthracnose and powdery 
mildew. The word “evolving” matters 
here: resistance is not a one-time victory. 
Pathogen populations shift, and breeders 
must keep the package updated.
Fernández emphasises that resistance 
packages depend on target market disease 
incidence. Fusarium wilt and anthracnose 
form a common baseline, but grafting prac­
tices and local conditions shape priorities. 
Powdery mildew is increasingly important 
globally, while potyviruses and tobamovi­
ruses are gaining relevance in certain areas.
Emilio Sarria Villada, breeding man­
ager watermelon, squash and beans at Rijk 
Zwaan, expands the list, showing how dif­
ferentiated between countries the threat 
landscape has become. Root diseases such 
as Fusarium are among the most challeng­
ing, tackled through grafting on inter­
specific rootstocks and through resistance 
introgression where rootstocks are not yet 
common. At the plant level, fungal dis­
eases like powdery mildew and anthrac­
nose remain significant, while viruses such 
as SqVYV and various tospoviruses can 
affect production in specific regions. Some 
pathogens impact fruit quality directly: 
CGMMV, acidovorax, and phytophthora. 
His programme’s objective is to integrate 
resistance while maintaining high fruit 
quality, because resistance that produces 
an unappealing fruit solves only half the 
problem.
“NEW” DISEASES, OR OLD ONES 
BEHAVING BADLY?
When asked about new diseases, Sarria 
Villada argues that the bigger trend is not 
brand-new threats, but the resurgence and 
increased incidence of familiar ones. Aphis 
gossypii infestations are becoming more 
frequent. Powdery mildew, once consid­
ered less critical, is now causing significant 
damage, particularly where effective chem­
ical control is not available. The broader 
message is that disease pressure is rising 
and breeding must fill the gaps.
Lopez Fernandez points to tobamo­
viruses, especially CGMMV, becoming 
increasingly prevalent due to mechanical 
transmission, particularly in certain areas 
and during procedures such as grafting. He 
also mentions potyviruses and poleoviruses 
becoming serious due to vector adaptability 
under climate change. Again, the thread is 
consistent: disease dynamics are shifting, 
and breeding must keep pace.
CROP PROTECTION 
RESTRICTIONS: BREEDING STEPS 
INTO THE GAP
Several breeders describe how restrictions 
on crop protection products have changed 
breeding priorities. Less chemistry available 
means more reliance on genetic solutions 
and integrated systems.
Fernández links restrictions on pes­
ticide use, lower maximum residue limits, 
respect for beneficial insects used in biolog­
ical control, and growth in organic farming 
to the promotion of hybrids with adapted 
genetic solutions, i.e. varieties that can 
deliver yields while meeting sustainability 
and market requirements.
Calvert similarly notes that the loss 
of crop protection products has increased 
focus on diseases that were not previously 
as high a priority. This has intensified 
research on disease resistance, adaptability, 
and resilience, maintaining fruit quality in 
the absence of chemical treatments. She 
also hints at a broader ecosystem approach, 
where genetics interacts with other grower 
solutions beyond seeds.
INVESTMENT AND TIMELINES: 
WHY “QUICK FIXES” 
DON’T EXIST
Watermelon breeding is a long journey even 
for seeded types, and it stretches further 
for seedless. Sarria Villada gives a detailed 
view of the pipeline. It begins with creating 
parental lines carrying key traits for both 
male and female components. Even with 
relatively fast cucurbit cycles, that initial 
stage takes more than two years. Then come 
first test crosses and evaluation of hybrids. 
Promising lines are crossed with multi­
ple partners over following years to find 
the best combinations. From hundreds of 
hybrids, only a small subset, perhaps 10 to 
20, moves into multi-environment pheno­
typing. Then come commercial evaluations, 
and if everything aligns, a variety may reach 
the market in two to three years after that 
phase begins.
For seedless programmes, he adds, 
tetraploid line development adds about 
two extra years, slowing progress further. 
Modern breeding also includes marker-as­
sisted selection, phytopathology testing, 
hybrid prediction analyses, and scouting 
genomic selection approaches. He empha­
sises multidisciplinary collaboration e.g. 
breeders, assistants, operations, molecular 
and phytopathology labs, genomic breed­
ers, working across locations to make the 
system run.
The practical takeaway is simple: when 
retailers want a new format “next season”, 
breeding cannot obey that timeline. The 
seed sector runs on long horizons.
STAYING ALIGNED WITH 
GROWERS: INFORMATION 
BECOMES A BREEDING INPUT
With such long development cycles, align­
ment with growers becomes critical. If you 
are breeding for eight to 10 years ahead, 
you must know where the market is going, 
without being able to know it perfectly.
Fernández describes building as many 
connections as possible between market and 
breeders. Teams in contact with farmers, 
Watermelon variety ‘Tropical Sunshine’. Photo: Rijk Zwaan

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.