26  I  SEED WORLD EUROPE  I  SEEDWORLD.COM/EUROPE | OCTOBER 2026
U
kraine is preparing for a major 
reset of its GMO legislation. In 
September 2026, a new law on 
the state regulation of genetic engineer­
ing activities and the control of genetically 
modified organisms (GMO) and products 
on the market is scheduled to enter into 
force.
For the seed sector, the law is more 
than a technical update. It is part of a wider 
effort to modernise Ukraine’s regulatory 
framework, strengthen biosafety oversight 
and prepare the country for deeper align­
ment with the European Union.
The law, adopted in August 2023, 
defines the legal and organisational prin­
ciples for regulating genetic engineering 
activities, ensuring environmental, genetic, 
food and biological safety, and controlling 
the placing of GMOs and GM products on 
the market.
It consists of 12 chapters, 43 arti­
cles and final and transitional provisions, 
covering everything from closed-system 
research to open-system testing, state regis­
ters, labelling, market placement, monitor­
ing, transboundary movement, laboratory 
requirements, state control and penalties.
For Ukraine, the timing matters. The 
country remains a major agricultural pro­
ducer and exporter, while at the same time 
moving through a demanding process of 
legal convergence with the EU.
In that context, GMO rules are not 
only about technology. They are also about 
trade, public trust, market access, enforce­
ment capacity and the credibility of the 
regulatory system.
According to Siuzana Grygorenko, 
executive director of the Seed Association 
of Ukraine, the new law should be seen 
in that broader context. “Ukraine needs a 
modern, transparent and predictable frame­
work for genetic engineering and GMO 
regulation,” she says. “This is important 
for biosafety, but also for legal certainty, 
investment, research and Ukraine’s contin­
ued integration with the European Union.”
Ukraine’s 
GMO Reset
The law distinguishes between genetic 
engineering activities in closed systems and 
the handling of GMOs in open systems. 
Closed-system activities are subject to dif­
ferent requirements depending on the risk 
level. The law identifies four risk levels 
and provides for declarations or permits 
depending on the level of risk involved. 
Open-system activities, including research 
and testing, require specific conditions and 
applications for permits.
This is particularly relevant for research 
organisations, breeders and companies that 
may be involved in biotechnology, trait 
development, testing or product assessment. 
The law provides a more defined pathway, 
but it also creates new administrative and 
compliance obligations.
Grygorenko stresses that the law 
should be understood as a framework law 
rather than as a complete implementation 
manual. “It creates the architecture for 
regulation, from research and testing to 
registration, labelling and state control,” 
she says. “For the seed sector, the practi­
cal question will be how this framework is 
implemented through bylaws and adminis­
trative procedures.”
REGISTRATION, REGISTERS AND 
MARKET PLACEMENT
The law establishes several state regis­
ters governing GMO activities, including 
the State Register of Subjects of Genetic 
Engineering Activity, the State Register 
of Permits for Conducting Research and 
Testing of GMOs in an Open System, and 
the State Register of GMOs. It also outlines 
the GMO registration process, including 
application requirements and procedures 
for review, approval, suspension and can­
cellation.
For the seed sector, these registers 
could become central tools for legal cer­
tainty. They can clarify who is authorised 
to conduct certain activities, which permits 
have been granted, and which GMOs are 
officially registered. However, their useful­
A NEW LAW WILL RESHAPE BIOSAFETY, REGISTRATION AND MARKET RULES AS 
UKRAINE MOVES CLOSER TO THE EU. BY: MARCEL BRUINS
A FRAMEWORK FOR THE FULL 
GMO CHAIN
One of the most important features of the 
new law is its breadth. It does not focus only 
on whether a GMO may or may not be cul­
tivated or placed on the market. Instead, 
it creates a wider regulatory structure for 
how genetic engineering activities are car­
ried out, how GMOs are assessed and reg­
istered, how GM products are labelled and 
traced, and how compliance is controlled.
Siuzana Grygorenko, executive director of the 
Seed Association of Ukraine (SAU)
“Ukraine 
is already 
preparing its 
regulatory 
system 
for future 
alignment with 
EU rules.”

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.